|
|
Viewing 1-9 of 9
|
|
|
1911ES 
Saint Clair Shores, MI
|
|
Posted: 6/25/10 9:15 PM
|
|
Member
(Apr 2010)
Last Here:
47 days ago
Posts:
Monthly (12)
Reputation:
n/a
|
|
I picked up the 642 for a summer carry weapon ... and this .38 is a top quality little revolver. Very accurate for the size, and perfcet for CCW. Suprised at how comfortable it aims and shoots, with very light recoil for a snubbie.
1911ES rates the Smith & Wesson Model 642: 
|
|
|
Maluus
Louisville, KY
|
|
Posted: 6/21/10 10:08 AM
|
|
Member
(Jun 2010)
Last Here:
3 days ago
Posts:
Monthly (3)
Reputation:
n/a
|
|
Bought one for me GF (her first ever weapon) to use for CCDW and she loves it -- she's dead on at 20ft with the Crimson Trace Laser. Recommend to anyone for CCDW!
Maluus rates the Smith & Wesson Model 642:
|
|
|
goanra
mulvane, KS
|
|
Posted: 4/30/10 11:12 AM
|
|
Member
(Feb 2010)
Last Here:
Yesterday
Posts:
Daily (526)
Reputation:
87%
|
|
I couldn't find a great price on one of these, so I went with the new Charter Arms 'On Duty' model, 38spl, +P rated, 12 oz, with the shrouded hammer [allows for SA] with Lifetime Warranty.
I
|
|
|
John_Doe
Mississippi
|
|
Posted: 3/28/10 4:53 PM
|
|
Member
(Mar 2010)
Last Here:
12 days ago
Posts:
Monthly (20)
Reputation:
n/a
|
|
I just bought a 642-2 for my daughter (photo #3). I got it for her because it is simple to use and easy to conceal. I have several of the Airweight 38's in my collection 442, 637, and now her 642. They are super guns.
John_Doe rates the Smith & Wesson Model 642:
|
|
|
chuckroast
Georgia
|
|
Posted: 3/16/10 8:24 PM
|
|
Member
(Mar 2010)
Last Here:
30 days ago
Posts:
Weekly (29)
Reputation:
33%
|
|
I own two of these bad-boys. So of course I love this little gun. I reload @ 20% light load for my wife and these things run flawlessly as you would expect. This may be the best choice for an under the car seat gun!
Great gun reviews @: www.pocket-defense.com
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1ofea
Pennsylvania
|
|
Posted: 2/20/10 6:00 PM
|
|
Member
(Aug 2009)
Last Here:
36 days ago
Posts:
Monthly (34)
Reputation:
n/a
|
|
Picked up the CT version about two years ago. Have only put a few rounds through it and it is flawless. I only wish I had the additional money back then to buy the 340CT version in .357. I still regret
1ofea rates the Smith & Wesson Model 642:
|
|
|
shoe
Ohio
|
|
Posted: 2/17/10 3:08 AM
|
|
Member
(May 2009)
Last Here:
204 days ago
Posts:
rarely (4)
Reputation:
n/a
|
|
I think this is the most ideal concealed carry handgun out there. 100% reliable, simple to operate, endless ammo selection (including + P), endless holster options, endless grip options (including
shoe rates the Smith & Wesson Model 642:
|
|
|
cutter
Florida
|
|
Posted: 2/8/10 9:15 PM
|
|
Member
(Jan 2010)
Last Here:
208 days ago
Posts:
rarely (1)
Reputation:
n/a
|
|
I have two of them my wife carries them it's perfect for her and the price brand new at the gun show last year was $300
This is a good CC if you prefer revolvers, hammerless and pretty
cutter rates the Smith & Wesson Model 642:
|
|
|
OlBlueSmoke
Indiana
|
|
Posted: 1/30/10 10:26 PM
|
|
Member
(Dec 2009)
Last Here:
177 days ago
Posts:
rarely (2)
Reputation:
n/a
|
|
I'm surprised to be the first to review this revolver. This aluminum framed, 5 shot, .38 caliber pocket gun weighs in at only 15 ounces unloaded and is double action only. It is rated for +P
OlBlueSmoke rates the Smith & Wesson Model 642:
|
|
|
Viewing 1-9 of 9
|
